You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: If MOT centre gets it wrong.. possible to get money back?
| Signal | 15 May 2007 17:49 |
>> > Just had a test centre fail my Mk3 Golf, cause : "front macpherson >> > strut has excessive movement in the upper support bearing assembly". [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] >from another garage alone may not be sufficient) or complain through >the authorities is another matter. Thanks guys - I tried. Politely explained to the mech that as a free floating assembly, VW said the wheels would effectively be "dangling" when the car is jacked, and what he described as "excessive movement" they considered normal. Explained that for this reason VW test Mk3 suspensions *on the ground*, with a shaker plate, and routinely pass cars brought to them which have failed MOTs on this technicality.
So he says, come down he'll show me the problem. He jacks up the car, puts a bar under a front wheel and demonstrated that the wheel could be lifted up and down by approx an inch, said other side is the same. I said OK.. that's expected according to VW.. and doesn't it strike you as odd that both sides behave exactly the same? Now *I* would't know if an inch is too much movement (opinions pls..) but this was adamant he wouldn't pass it unless the top mounts were replaced, so I'm getting nowhere.
Also I read that... http://www.motester.co.uk/st7.html "...unless that joint is really ready to pop-out, the VOSA creed is pass and advise"
Anyway, took it to another MOT centre it passed.
-- S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t
|
| Tommo | 15 May 2007 08:43 |
> > Just had a test centre fail my Mk3 Golf, cause : "front macpherson > > strut has excessive movement in the upper support bearing assembly". [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > quickly sorted out without any fuss. Less experienced testers do make > these mistakes from time to time. I think this is good advice. Try and resolve it amicably, and with a bit of luck they will refund you. If not, I think you certainly should be able to take the matter further. You should not have to pay for defective services, and an MOT is no different. Whether the best option is to sue for such a small amount of money (remember you will need proof that they got their advice wrong - they new MOT certificate from another garage alone may not be sufficient) or complain through the authorities is another matter.
|
| Djornsk | 15 May 2007 07:27 |
> Just had a test centre fail my Mk3 Golf, cause : "front macpherson > strut has excessive movement in the upper support bearing assembly". [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > -- > S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t Many years ago I made the same mistake when testing a VW and on that occasion the customer had simply returned to the garage and it was quickly sorted out without any fuss. Less experienced testers do make these mistakes from time to time.
j
|
| Signal | 14 May 2007 18:42 |
Just had a test centre fail my Mk3 Golf, cause : "front macpherson strut has excessive movement in the upper support bearing assembly". This is reported for both front sides. He said when the car was lifted, there was 1cm (or 1in.. can't remember) of play.
I have since spoken to VW and two other garages, and they all say this sort of play is standard by design - VW said they have never seen a car fail an MOT with such a fault on one side, let alone both.
One of the other garages I spoke to offered to double check this for free, and will do the MOT for free (charging only if it passes). They only do MOTs, so are obviously not scouting for work. However I've already paid the initial tester and have 10 days for a retest. I feel if they are in error I'm owed my money back, but I don't know how to approach this situation. I'm guessing if I straighten them out on this point and go back for the restest, there's a chance other faults and expenses may materialize.
Any suggestions on how to deal with this?
-- S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t
|
Quick links: