Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Announcements

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Employee Discounts Are Driving Consumers Away From Captive Financing

Power Information Network   29 Jul 2005 15:40 GMTPage rating:


The employee discount programs being offered by the Big Three are moving some consumers away from financing through the manufacturers' captive financing arms, according to the Power Information Network (PIN).

PIN finds that the percentage of consumers using the Big Three's captive financing services has dropped 13 percentage points--from 56 percent to 43 percent for new-vehicle finance and lease contracts since the companies began offering employee discounts to all consumers. Ford Credit and GMAC are down 27 percent, while Chrysler Financial is down 17 percent. During the same period, the captive financing arms of Toyota, Nissan and Honda have experienced a 0.6 percent decline in captive penetration.

General Motors started its GM Employee Discount for Everyone campaign in June, while Ford Motor Company began offering its Ford Family Plan and DaimlerChrysler its Chrysler Group's Employee Pricing Plus program to all consumers on July 1.

"There are three primary reasons for these declines," said Tom Libby, senior director of industry analysis at the Power Information Network. "Banks, independents, and credit unions were more aggressive, leasing was down, and bonus cash incentives for captive financing have declined."

PIN finds that banks have decreased their buy rates by 18 to 29 basis points on their GM, Chrysler, and Ford loans, while GMAC and Chrysler Financial both saw their buy rates increase by more than 50 points. Ford Credit's buy rates declined 7 points, compared to a 27-point decline among banks financing new Ford vehicles.

"Captives dominate the automotive leasing business and their programs tend to be more competitive than other lessors," Libby said. "Captive lease competitiveness comes from the residual support that their manufacturers provide. These current incentives do not encourage consumers to lease. This has forced the captives to get a greater percent of their business from loans."

Lease penetration rates at Ford Credit are down 16 percent, while GMAC leases are down 14 percent and Chrysler Financial 2 percent.

"In the past, GM, Chrysler, and Ford have used incentives that encouraged consumers to finance through their captives," Libby said. "These incentives have been on the decline over the past six months and have been minimal since the employee discount incentive programs were launched. Without these incentives, captives are clearly less competitive."

The average amount financed through captives by consumers using the employee discount programs from the captives is $25,373--nearly $1,300 more than the average amount financed prior to the employee discount incentives. The average monthly payment has also increased from $468 to $489. In addition, the average financing term has expanded from 59 months to 61 months.

"A two-month increase in financing terms may seem insignificant," Libby said. "But when you consider the number of vehicles being sold and the average monthly payment of $489, it raises the consumer's obligation by $2,200 over the life of the loan."


Rate this page
Poor Excellent    

Comments Post new comment

No comments at this time. Why not be the first?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Post new comment
Rate this page



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.